The founders of the NGO Robin des Bois had the ambition to be a force of proposition, not only protestation. Robin des Bois’ effectiveness stems from extensive historical documentation, quality investigations, a multidisciplinary culture, an absence of prejudice, and freedom of speech. Robin des Bois does not receive instructions, does not defend a particular interest group, and is not attached to any political party.

During its first two decades of existence, Robin des Bois has worked for the protection of forests, for better waste management, for recycling in satisfactory social and environmental conditions, for the remediation of soils, for the improvement of working conditions on ships and in factories, for the preservation of water resources, against marine pollution, and against ivory smuggling. Robin des Bois has worked on certain issues for 20 years. The association abstains from promoting a field, a material, a procedure, or a technique that all secondary or collateral effects of its application have not yet been explored or taken into account.

Robin des Bois plays a voluntary role of assistance to citizens within the limits of its capability and uses all recourses of dialogue with listeners of good faith.

Non Governmental Organization
for the Protection of Man and the Environment
Object: “To bring together, nationally and internationally, all people and corporate bodies, who desire to participate in the protection of the environment and of Man through non-violent actions, in the defense of endangered species, the safeguarding of natural habitats, and the rational and equitable management of natural resources.” - June 1985
   



   
   


   
Jojoba is a key tree for Robin des Bois and for the Sonora Desert. It is part of the association’s foundation and illustrates the will of proposition. Oil from jojoba seeds, practically unknown in Europe in 1985, is a substitute for whale spermaceti and is used as cosmetic oil.


Since 1988, the association has participated in ministerial and interministerial working groups to defend their objectives where decisions are made.

Robin des Bois currently holds positions in the following decision making bodies: the Superior Counsel of Listed Facilities, the National Commission of Aid for Polluted Soils of ADEME (Agency for the Environment and Energy Control), the National Commission of Aid in the Radioactive Sector of ANDRA (National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management), the National Commission for the management of WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment), the National Commission of procedures for VHU (vehicles out of use), the Consulting Commission for the elaboration and following of national plans for decontamination and elimination of appliances containing PCB and PCT (Commission degraded to working group at the end of 2006).
Robin des Bois is a member of the following working groups:
working group on Polluted Sites and Soils of the Superior Counsel of Listed Facilities, interministerial working group on the transposition of the Directive for used batteries and accumulators, interministerial working group on the management of used tires, interministerial working group on procedures for textile wastes, working group CODIR-PA for waste management, contaminated products, and contaminated lands following events of nuclear origins, North Cotentin Radioecology Group (near the Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant), National Plan for Radioactive Waste Management.
Robin des Bois is an observer in three International Historic Conventions:
the IWC (International Whaling Commission) since 1986, the CITES (Washington Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) since 1988, and OSPAR (Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic) since 2005.


A Complex Work from A to Z: example of the Ivory Coast

When the Panamanian ship, Probo Koala, unloaded nearly 500 tons of ship generated waste at Abidjan in August 2006, and this toxic waste had been dropped off all around the capital of the Ivory Coast, Robin des Bois immediately demanded the return of the waste to Europe and launched its means of investigation. When rumors circulated in Abidjan at the same time as the sanitary impacts of the waste deposit, Robin des Bois organized a press conference in the Ivory Coast and revealed all the errors and anomalies in the Probo Koala’s conduct and operating waste management and refinement of oil aboard that previously occurred in Amsterdam, Netherlands, in Tallinn, Estonia, and in Gibraltar, United Kingdom. When the waste mixed with sediment (9000 tons) arrived for reprocessing in France, the NGO demanded and obtained specific modalities of information. At the time, Robin des Bois protested against reactions of the “not in my backyard” syndrome and at the same time called for a total transparency of modalities of treatment near Lyon. When it was measured that releases from the kiln scheduled for the incineration of Probo Koala wastes were exceeding the rules, Robin des Bois, Robin des Bois, with local associations, whishes that treatment would be deferred as long as the dioxin anomalies remained uncorrected. Simultaneously, a representative of Robin des Bois actively participated in all concerned states of Europe in the International Commission of Investigation, named by the Ivory Coast government.

From Road Seven to the North Pole
To clarify Robin des Bois’ ubiquity, it is convenient to concentrate on the example of closed gas stations and the Arctic. When Robin des Bois entered Grenelle of the Environment (National round table concerning the environment) through the window, it created an effect of a crazy dog at a family dinner. All the trophies were in place—biodiversity, pesticides, global warming, air pollution, reduction of this, non-allowance of that—and the guests were at the table. Robin des Bois succeeded in imposing dishes of resistance and unpredicted “petits fours” into the menu: noise, medication residue in water, post-catastrophic waste, litter in the ocean, closed gas stations, and the Arctic Ocean.
Closed gas stations are everyday pollution. They are derelict sites at the entrance of villages and along national roads, threatening water wells, neighboring caves and underground waters. Gas pumps reconverted into pizzerias or disguised in no man’s lands of concrete that attract waste, it’s a new French postcard. Robin des Bois could only be attentive to these stories of leaking tanks and polluted soils. Therefore, without announcement, Robin des Bois proposed this major issue largely underestimated to the appraisal of “Grenellocratie” which wasn’t prepared to be found with dirty hands. The national park of closed gas stations and their necessary rehabilitation leapt over all obstacles up to the final report. A large advancement for Robin des Bois, who will now decline those in working groups—oil producers, garages, elected officials, ministries, environmental protection groups—that must be patiently pushed, accelerated, and moved forward as Robin des Bois routinely does for other subjects.
The Arctic is another thing; it is leaving the down to earth to reach the planet. Robin des Bois has always worked on large living spaces—oceans and forests—traveled by migrating animals, and battered by predation and human degradation. It appeared to Robin des Bois in 1994, at the International Whaling Commission in Mexico, that the Arctic Ocean should benefit from a treaty, if not identical, at least analogous, to that of the Antarctic—despite the political difficulties attached—and that France and Europe needed to better reflect on and initiate it. Therefore, Robin des Bois introduced a proposal within the Grenelle biodiversity group. This enormous stake that Robin des Bois had carried alone in these circumstances was widely adopted as evidence and became a priority during the French presidency of the European Union. The treaty of the Arctic demands, without doubt, more time to develop and reach that protocol of remediation of gas stations in France and in the French territories. At the end of the process—it is necessary to be optimistic—it will be convenient to remember that Robin des Bois is at its origin.


The Case of Clemenceau and information bulletins “Shipbreaking.com”.

The demolition of ships at the end of their life is a neglected sector in waste management. The worldwide NGO movement agrees on this subject. This convergence of visions provokes a divergence of methods. Robin des Bois assessed the dismantling of Clemenceau in India after a preliminary extraction of asbestos, and in the effective conditions of partnership, would have imposed a better manner of working on Indian demolition sites. The expectation of Robin des Bois and its strategy was to encourage access to Clemenceau in India and to supervise the conditions of its demolition. Since January 2006, Robin des Bois has regularly published its bulletins “A la Casse.com” on ship demolition. They reflect the economic and geographic conditions of the market and show a stagnation of working conditions in Asia. Robin des Bois favors the opening of demolition sites in Europe and has demanded them since 2000. At the same time, the group is conscious that the largest part of ship demolitions will continue to take place in Asia—as do their construction—and that partnerships and bilateral actions as they were tried in the case of Clemenceau must be consolidated and enhanced.


Leaving pro-nuclear and anti-nuclear

The NGO has supported the diversification of energy sources for more than 10 years. Insofar, Robin des Bois is also very vigilant regarding energies presented as a way out of nuclear power, such as gas, wind power, and wood burning. Robin des Bois does not see the economic or ecologic justification of reprocessing nuclear spent fuel and extracting plutonium. Robin des Bois is opposed to the exportation and importation of radioactive waste, and condemns the authorization modalities for the construction of the new EPR reactor in Flamanville in the English Channel. Robin des Bois actively participates in the inventory of sources of radioactivity outside of artificial radioactivity—see this subject in the file “La Radioactivité Naturelle Techonologiquement Renforcée” (Technologically Enhanced Natural Radioactivity) on our website. Few organizations have the past and the antinuclear culture of Robin des Bois, but this does not prevent Robin des Bois—on the contrary—from joining specialists to participate in elaborating a doctrine of management for the effects of an accident in a nuclear settlement or in a mobile vector that involves nuclear materials.

Catastrophes and Wars
Robin des Bois considers it a priority to lead preventative actions regarding industrial and natural hazards. In this perspective, the group wrote a report on the sanitary and environmental risks of post-catastrophic wastes, available on the website in the French version, and regularly carries out inventories of recoveries and of deposits of war traces on French territory. The will of Robin des Bois is to improve the conditions of finding locations, storage, and elimination of abandoned munitions and to move France towards respecting the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction.


Robin des Bois and money

The association is financed by its memberships and donations, sales of Jojoba oil at events and by mail, and by the environmental advises that consists of industrial site visits and the completion of detailed visit reports. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, an allocation of 20,000 euros was granted by the Minister of Ecology. The association’s annual resources are around 200,000 euros. Allergic to delusional slogans, accosting photos, apocalyptic announcements, and harassing solicitation on the streets and in mailboxes, Robin des Bois consequentially experiences frequent financial difficulties. However, this precariousness that leads to a vulnerability that could serve as pretext for the liquidation of Robin des Bois is not in line with the group’s long term actions. Robin des Bois needs financial support from those with which he is in affinity.



Robin des Bois Membership

To become a member of Robin des Bois, you may be a personal or corporate body subscriber, a benefactor, or a donor. In all cases, you are invited to the annual General Assembly. If you provide your e-mail address, you will receive our news releases (mainly in French) and reports before the media, unless otherwise indicated.

name
n ame of corporate body if necessary
address
postal code
city
e-mail (optional)

• subscriber 50 euros
• donor from 100 euros

Choose your method of payment:
By money transfer (bank account details below)
By postal/money order

Form to complete or fill out and return
Robin des Bois, 14, rue de l’Atlas 75019 Paris FRANCE

Robin des Bois does not publish, give, or sell the contact information of its subscribers, benefactors, donors, or sympathizers in any case. You benefit from a right of access and correction of information that concerns you in our informational listing.


RIB Robin des Bois
Crédit Coopératif Agence Paris Gare de l’Est
Code Banque 42559 Code Guichet 00003 Numéro de Compte 21027465303 Clé Rib 11


Robin des Bois
Association de protection de l’Homme et de l’environnement
14 rue de l’Atlas 75019 PARIS – Tel : 01.48.04.09.36 / Fax : 01.48.04.56.41
contact@robindesbois.org

 


 
novembre 2007