Notice
#1: Pollution in the Ivory Coast
1.)
On the applicable law concerning cargo residues or ship-generated
waste:
The cargo residues pumped in Abidjan on August 19 and 20th from the
tanks of the Probo Koala are not beholden to the Basel Convention,
which theoretically obliges countries exporting waste and the countries
importing them to establish a bilateral dossier giving evidence that
the first does not have adequate techniques of treating these wastes
and that the second has adequate available techniques or still that
the exported waste are beneficially useful to the importing country.
The Basel Convention excludes ship-generated waste from its jurisdiction
in its founding text.
However, and just to satisfy the juridical vacancy, the European directive
on facilities for port reception of ship-generated waste and cargo
residues (2000) requires all ships nearing ports of the European community
to unload their waste in designated facilities. The treatment, beneficial
usage, and elimination of exploited waste and cargo residues must
conform to European legislation, notably that concerning used oils
and dangerous waste.
Insofar as the Probo Koala was already loaded with
its cargo waste in the European ports that it entered in July 2006
before making its way towards Lagos and Abidjan, it is in violation
of the European legislation and the national law of European States
where it called into port before its incursion into the southern hemisphere.
This scenario, which seems the most plausible in view of declarations
from the both ship owner and the charterer stationed in Europe, implies
then a conspiracy on their part and a negligence of European authorities
allowing the actions of important economies to the detriment of the
sanitary and environmental state of a totally disorganized and economically
stricken country. The treatment of these polluted sludge and their
elimination would cost in Europe 400-500 euros per m³, 10-15
times more than in the Ivory Coast.
The hypothesis that some liquid or paste waste were mixed with cargo
residues just for the purpose of dodging the Basel Convention cannot
be ruled out.
2)
On the substances dumped in the Ivory Coast such as ship-generated
waste, residual waters, and cargo waste.
They arrive undoubtedly from a refinery or from a producer or distributor
of fuel or petroleum products situated in Europe or using European
ports for the shipment of products or sub products. These wastes could
have been mixed by the charterer Trafigura, which lost their traceability
voluntarily or involuntarily during this mixing operation. The presence
of caustic soda is sometimes cited as component of sludge; it may
be clarified by the fact that some Probo Koala’s tanks
are or were dedicated to the transport of caustic soda.
3)
On sanitary effects
Hydrogen sulfur and thiol, routinely cited in the compositions of
the sludge dumped in Abidjan, are mortal by inhalation in a closed
atmosphere, as shown in the accidents suffered by the sewer men community
or those in direct proximity to the discharge source. As an example,
a non-scheduled and recent emission of hydrogen sulfide at the Total
refinery in Gonfreville L’Orcher led to the evacuation of 700
workers, some of which needed to be hospitalized for examination;
to date no after-effects have been recorded. It is probable that the
open-cast drainage pits for deposits and dump in Abidjan encourage
the migration of parts of the waste across a particularly dense and
exposed urban area. If the magnitude of the contamination was confirmed,
it is also probable that other toxic molecules are incorporated in
the mixture. The role of sodium hydroxide is in any case to blame.
4)
On the flow of waste across Africa
An initial wave of exportation or of an exportation project for toxic
waste towards Africa from Europe and the United States was noted and
denounced between 1985 and 1990. It affected Benin, Guinea-Bissau,
Congo, Nigeria, Angola, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, and Djibouti.
The list is not exhaustive. It is in attempting to clog these North-South
transfers that the Basel Convention and European restrictive regulations
were put in place in 1990. As already mentioned, none of these core
regulations take into account ship-generated waste and cargo residues.
Today the
flow of dangerous industrial waste to Africa is reduced, except those
originating from ship tanks and holds. But the exportation of worn
and discarded consumer goods (tires, used oils, electric and electronic
equipment waste, cars, heavy load and agricultural material, containing
asbestos, hydrocarbons, and PCBs) has continued across Africa for
some years. All these flows of waste are unfortunately encouraged
by the in vogue notion of re-use, and these new movements are clearly
negative fallbacks of politics concerning the sorting and recycling
put forward in Europe, without large scale means of dismantling.
In addition, waste of high added value, like contaminated copper from
PCB’s transformers and capacitors, or the entire transformers
and capacitors themselves, are shipped to places such as Asia for
metal stripping. It is the same case for ships at the end of their
lives, which, also not clearly or universally defined as waste, are
nonetheless important origins of recyclable metals and toxic substances
requiring elimination in due form.
(see http://www.robindesbois.org/dossiers/BulletinNavires.pdf).
See also:
Trafigura
captured by Mercaptan and Hydrogen Sulphide. July 23, 2010.
Trafigura
lies - Probo Koala and Trafigura's trial in Amsterdam. June
28, 2010
Probo
Koala, the book. May 2010
Toxic
wastes in Abidjan.
Wastes returning to Europe, Nov
7, 2006
Ivory
Coast Waste: Return to Sender,
September
29, 2006.
Notice
#4: Toxic wastes in the Ivory Coast and fires of repetition in France,
September
19, 2006
Notice
#3: French businessmen stuck in Abidjan’s toxic mixture,
September
14, 2006.
Call
for a waste charter, September 12, 2006.
Notice
#2: Ivory Coast Pollution, September 12, 2006
For the whole story (only available in French):
http://www.robindesbois.org/dossiers/probo_koala/page_probo_koala.html